showbiz

We've got the answers to your 'Religulous' questions!

Posted on Wednesday, Sept. 24, 2008
by Cineplex Entertainment

Larry Charles and Bill Maher

Thanks for your enthusiastic response to our Q&A session with the inquisitive minds behind Religulous.

Unfortunately, due to scheduling conflicts, TVA Films regrets to inform that Bill Maher will no longer be able to participate in this forum.

Larry Charles, the film's director, was able to take part - check out his answers to your questions here.

TVA films and mycineplex apologize for this unforeseen circumstance and want to encourage your continued participation in the mycineplex community. Don't forget to enter the Religulous contest for a trip for 2 to Rome - exclusively for mycineplex members.

Stay tuned for more exclusive opportunities and thanks again for your participation!

You need to be logged in to leave a comment.

    • DeepS84
    • Written at 3:28 p.m. on Wednesday, Oct. 8, 2008

    • Two questions:
      What was the most fascinating part of making your documentary?
      and
      What do you say to Buddhists in India/Nepal who claim that Christ was in India during his teens and young adulthood ages?

    • Lauren17
    • Written at 12:58 p.m. on Monday, Oct. 6, 2008

    • Bill Maher: What do you think of Christopher Hitchens' assertion that "religion poisons everything"?

      Larry Charles: You're clearly a genius, but what's the deal with the ZZ Top look?

      Bill & Larry: What's the backlash been like? Any death threats yet?

    • Regulator
    • Written at 10:05 a.m. on Thursday, Oct. 2, 2008

    • How religious are you? Do you practice your own religion?

    • exubai
    • Written at 4:40 p.m. on Tuesday, Sept. 30, 2008

    • Do you feel that, as both an entertainer and someone with an agenda, sometimes the punchline takes precedence over the in-depth discourse?

    • catwoman
    • Written at 6:35 a.m. on Tuesday, Sept. 30, 2008

    • What do you think about your film, 'Religulous' being compared to Ben Stein's 'Expelled'? The approach taken seems to be very similar: another documentary using mockery to ridicule people interviewed, hiding the real purpose of why they are there from those interviewing etc ... is one just another carbon copy of the other?